4 ms·
So it's purely a bill to spawn discussion... again 18 year olds are old enough to join the military but "it is clear that persons under 21 years of age are not
by kbd 7y ago
So it's purely a bill to spawn discussion... again 18 year olds are old enough to join the military but "it is clear that persons under 21 years of age are not developmentally mature enough to safely possess [cell phones]", the bill reads." Waste of everyone's time.
- gbear605 7y agoThe discussion is exactly about that. It’s a response to Vermont raising the age for gun ownership and tobacco usage to 21. So it’s the exact same logic. You agree with the bill’s author.
- Dylan16807 7y ago> You agree with the bill's author. I'm skeptical of that, considering how horribly broken the bill's analogy is. "Cell phones have often been used by mass shooters of younger ages for research on previous shootings." is so much of a strawman that it's a bale of hay.