4 ms·
Neat site, but it would be good to have some information on who created it, who did this research, and who (if anyone) funded it.
by zeofig 7y ago
Neat site, but it would be good to have some information on who created it, who did this research, and who (if anyone) funded it.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- abdullahkhalids 7y agoAbsolutely. Just because there are references at the end doesn't mean this is credible. There is a lot of work and expertise that goes into selecting the right and reasonably complete set of references, then accurately and correctly synthesizing information from those references into the current work. Part of this expertise is signaled by knowing who wrote the thing. Otherwise, absent expert peer review, no one should be believing any of this.
- IshKebab 7y agoAnd if it actually worked. Seems like they described some kind of experimental setup and then just stopped? I only skimmed it though.
- mkj 7y agoTeam's http://rubyplants.com/ruby-team.html http://rubyplants.com/ruby-team.html There's a map at the bottom of http://rubyplants.com/autonomous-chambers-2.html http://rubyplants.com/autonomous-chambers-2.html Seems to be a cute pivot from an online plant nursery??? https://www.sublimesucculents.com/plant-for-thought-online-nursery-interview/ https://www.sublimesucculents.com/plant-for-thought-online-n... Faster iteration does seem like it could give useful results, though unsure why they'd target plants not algae. Maybe plants are easier to contain?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- aroch 7y agohttps://rubyplants.com/ruby-team.html https://rubyplants.com/ruby-team.html Not linked on the current home page for whatever be the reason