4 ms·
I have 250/100 mbit/s, my brother has 1000/1000 mbit/s. Both are included in our rent. I don't like Stadia for other reasons but saying that consumer access is
by ecmascript 7y ago
I have 250/100 mbit/s, my brother has 1000/1000 mbit/s. Both are included in our rent.
I don't like Stadia for other reasons but saying that consumer access is not capable because you live in a country that sucks on that part is not really a good argument.
Do you think modern cars are a bad idea as well because there are parts in Africa that doesn't have good roads?
- jokoon 7y agoMmmh for stadia to work well, the bandwidth necessary is pretty high. Unless you have fiber, it's not worth it. Some DSL internet still suck today.
- SmirkingRevenge 7y ago> Unless you have fiber, it's not worth it. You don't need fiber. Feels as good as local play on my 220 Mbps down/15 Mbps up internet.
- jokoon 7y agoyou have that without fiber? without DSL? anyway most users don't have such a high bandwidth...
- SmirkingRevenge 7y agoMegabits, not bytes, if that's what you are thinking. That's about 27 MBps down and a lousy 1.9 MBps up. Decent, but its not even close to fiber. And I don't think its particularly greats bandwidth... just about every medium/major metro in US is going to have comparable internet or better.
- jokoon 7y agoI know. 1.9MB/s is still a very good DSL. Many users don't have such good bandwidth.
- ecmascript 7y agoWhat I am saying in northen europe where I live, it's uncommon not to have access to fiber.