It's not democratic, so what? It doesn't mean it's not necessary. Democracy doesn't always work for the public interest. > seen as an alarming development in a

It's not democratic, so what? It doesn't mean it's not necessary. Democracy doesn't always work for the public interest. > seen as an alarming development in a country's history. What do you mean? How would "an alarming development" be problematic? Democracy or not, action is required, and despite knowledge of the problem, I don't see any progress. I have nothing against democracy. > and any political attempt to make them will be met with a huge amount of backlash and instability. I think there is enough support for drastic measures, I don't think instability is a big risk. And if there is not enough support today, there will be more at each new heatwave and forest fire.