3 ms·
Depending on your definition of "enough support", Rust might be what you want. > not a steep learning curve well, it's steeper than most languages, but less s
by umanwizard 7y ago
Depending on your definition of "enough support", Rust might be what you want.
> not a steep learning curve
well, it's steeper than most languages, but less so than C++ IMO, especially if you're already familiar with C++ and therefore understand the problems Rust is intended to solve.
- jokoon 7y agoIf you already know C, C++ is easier. You can still pick what you like in C++. Still ,there aren't that many languages that compile to native.
- pjmlp 7y agoYeah the list is indeed quite small. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiled_language https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiled_language
- jokoon 7y agoWhen you cross that list with language usage, support etc, you don't have a lot left. My point is that maybe most of those languages are not suitable, and that nobody really like those languages. Just cross all the arguments I gave about those languages, how they score, etc: C/C++ are the most used language that compiles to native and it gets criticized. "There are languages people complain about, and languages people nobody uses" Meaning we only complain about language we use.