4 ms·
Last I checked, cars do not require any licensing to own. They require special licensing and often times yearly taxes to operate on public roads (but merely po
by SkyBelow 7y ago
Last I checked, cars do not require any licensing to own. They require special licensing and often times yearly taxes to operate on public roads (but merely possessing them on public roads does not).
- jonny_eh 7y agoYou need to register the car, and that often requires proof of insurance, which requires a driver's license. Either way, my point still stands. You're quibbling over semantics. So few people want to buy a car just to not drive it, that we don't even consider it a problem.
- kortilla 7y agoNo, you don’t need to register the car if you don’t intend to drive it on public roads. See farms.
- SlowRobotAhead 7y ago> You're quibbling over semantics. Not at all. He’s accurately reflecting gun laws and car laws. You are willfully hand waving the fact that cars are entirely unregulated except for use on public roads. As where guns are regulated in every facet of their existence. You are doing this because you read on a liberal site and heard the liberal talking points that guns are easier to get than a car with is wrong. It’s not semantic, your argument is invalid.
- mlyle 7y ago> and often times yearly taxes to operate on public roads (but merely possessing them on public roads does not). In my jurisdiction one may not "move" or "leave standing" upon a public road an unregistered vehicle, in addition to not being permitted to "drive" it.
- SkyBelow 7y agoWow, you can't tow an unregistered vehicle? That definitely sounds off, but then I've seen even more silly laws in the past (such as one that forbids minors from playing pinball).
- mlyle 7y agoYou can tow it if its wheels do not touch the road; otherwise the owner is liable for it being on the road without registration. The state wants its registration dollars.