4 ms·
Training is an abstract term these days. Could've meant training an algorithm, or training a person, depending on context. Hence the training for "what" or for
by kempbellt 7y ago
Training is an abstract term these days. Could've meant training an algorithm, or training a person, depending on context.
Hence the training for "what" or for "who" not being immediately parseable.
Until @ryacko said "Whom do you think I'm talking about?", I wasn't sure either.
- Dylan16807 7y agoElectron gives you a UI and some standard library stuff. That's pretty obviously a totally separate issue from training an algorithm... I think? Am I missing something? I still think asking "what or who?" with no other elaboration is really confusing. It's such a vague question that you have to guess how to answer, and it's super easy to answer it in a way that doesn't satisfy what the asker actually meant to ask.