4 ms·
> But you don't get to call someone out for being prejudiced when they are literally following the advice given to them by specialists who are trying to promote
by hitekker 7y ago
> But you don't get to call someone out for being prejudiced when they are literally following the advice given to them by specialists who are trying to promote diversity and inclusion.
"Just following orders" does not absolve one of responsibility.
If I "listen" to the advice of a specialist to call an African American the n-word, and then I scream the n-word repeatedly in front of others, then those people have the right to call me prejudiced. The onus is on me to prove my lack of prejudice, not on my accusers. The alternative is enabling racial supremacists to hurl vitriol so long as they "do a bit of Googling" and supply a PDF that says "expert says epithets are ok!"
Do you know the difference between authority and morality?
- Supermancho 7y agoThen you would have been willing to risk your job (as it was implied to have an element of accountability) AND you think you have an established ethic that would reject this exercise. That is a rare position and quality, which should give you pause. ie Not everyone is you.
- shadowgovt 7y agoIn a court of law, if someone sues over the scenario you've described, appeal to authority is exactly how a defendant would argue that what they did isn't considered racist and therefore doesn't violate the law. To understand the pathological behavior if megacorporations, look to the law under which they operate.