I saw a hint of this in a paper describing how something in climate change was found to be positive or not as bad as previously thought. It ended with a call to

I saw a hint of this in a paper describing how something in climate change was found to be positive or not as bad as previously thought. It ended with a call to action for people to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, despite the paper itself not being about that. Why? Maybe either the scientists were activists uncomfortable with their own findings or they were afraid of being rejected for denialism.