4 ms·

Sorry, I still don't understand. What do you mean by quoting vs. generalized code generation? In Lisp the macro can be a procedure, which takes expressions and

• seanmcdirmid 7y ago
  It can be, but generally isn’t as most macros don’t require generalized code generation, so quoting works just fine. Going back to the first comment I was replying to: > (In one case, I knew an experienced C# programmer to build and compile an expression at run-time using LambdaExpression [1]. It takes about 10 times as many lines to achieve the same thing, and you have to write in a style that looks nothing at all like a normal function, so in practice nobody ever does this. In contrast, the way to accomplish this in Lisp takes one character, and the code looks identical to a normal function, so it's not unheard of.) I assume they mean that they didn’t need to manipulate expressions in a general way because what they wanted was a simple macro that lisp supports with nice template/quote syntax, whereas C# doesn’t support macros at all but you can do something hacky with general run-time code generation.