5 ms·
I fail to see how this is any better than existing first strike weapons. Anti-anti-ballistic-missile technology doesn't mean much when anti-ballistic missiles
by ohazi 7y ago
I fail to see how this is any better than existing first strike weapons.
Anti-anti-ballistic-missile technology doesn't mean much when anti-ballistic missiles barely work, and all your adversaries have lots of rockets each with lots of reentry vehicles.
- roamerz 7y agoMaybe destabilizing means we, the US now have less time to make a decision on a first strike by Russia and the potential for an incorrect analysis leads to a retaliatory strike before we lose the ability to do so.
- peteretep 7y agoThat sounds like it would be a net negative for Russia
- imtringued 7y agoMissiles are worthless if you can destroy them before they are launched.