First, that implies there's some sort of authority - legal or otherwise - that determines "socially valuable." Are literally saying we should live a society wi

First, that implies there's some sort of authority - legal or otherwise - that determines "socially valuable." Are literally saying we should live a society without either values or institutions that make judgements about values? Right now, the justice system, the zoning system and the operations of private foundations, and beyond are engaging in leadership that makes value judgements about what is socially valuable. That is how society has worked historically and the US in earlier times made those judgements more explicit. Point blank denying this is actually calling for even more social change than the article.