3 ms·
>Periodically forgive all debts. This will be priced into debts, see short term lending rates. Those who can't make money by lending won't lend, meaning the b
by SkyBelow 7y ago
>Periodically forgive all debts.
This will be priced into debts, see short term lending rates. Those who can't make money by lending won't lend, meaning the borrowers will have to either not get the money or turn to those who don't play by the legal system.
>I'm curious, but ignorant, of the Quran's notion of riba, the prohibition on interest payments.
The money from interest is instead added to the price. It has some differences (less ability to save money by paying off early), but overall the lenders still make their money.
>I'd like more discussion about our own debt-based economy.
For starters, we can look to stop the sin tax on labor. Granted, most people don't call it a sin tax, but the difference between a sin tax and a tax appears to be marketing.
- specialist 7y agoCall it bankruptcy if that helps. Otherwise, I agree that lenders should bear more (most?) of the burdens for risky lending.
- bernawil 7y ago> borrowers will have to either not get the money If credit shrinks, asset prices decrease so borrowers would need less money anyway. In the end it's all about who owns the capital. Mesopotamian civilizations had to forgive debts periodically because the economy was heavily leveraged: farmers had to rent the land. A bad harvest could mean they'd have to sell their children to slavery. They were also surrounded by nomadic tribes. Social unrest would spiral out of control pretty quickly as broke people would join the nomads and turn to pillage. That's a lesson every Abrahamic religion learned.