4 ms·
>The problem is the automated Amazon system that processes your report and the obviously fucked up way it operates. There should be a button available to autho
by wang_li 7y ago
>The problem is the automated Amazon system that processes your report and the obviously fucked up way it operates.
There should be a button available to authors and publishers that says "i dispute these flags" and when the button is pushed, the flags are put into a temporary status and the reviewer's/submitter's real name and address is provided to the author so the author can take them to court for damages. If the flagged items are just low quality then the author would lose in court and the submitted flagged items could then be assessed against the work. If the flagged items are not legitimate, then the person who submitted the bad reports can write a nice check to the author and amazon can then drop the bad reports from their system. The idea that everything can, or should, be handled within a platform (facebook, twitter, amazon, apple, google, etc.) is idiotic. There is a legal system for a reason and it's so that we can get a consistent and fair adjudication of our disputes.
- MBCook 7y agoSo if I mark that there are 3 commas in a row and a word is clearly wrong due to OCR errors the author can press a button AND GET MY ADDRESS? Yeah, no chance of abuse there.
- wang_li 7y ago> Yeah, no chance of abuse there. The author having to file a lawsuit against you is a much higher hurdle to get over than an anti-fan falsely flagging the authors work and costing them money. The common idea that people should be able to do anything they want without consequences and with a huge corporation -- who doesn't know them from Bob -- having to provide them with cover is childish.
- mokus 7y agoDoes it really need to be pointed out that a name and address enable far more than a lawsuit?