3 ms·
No he shouldn't. We need to stop sending people to jail for all but the most heinous of crimes. He should be ordered to pay you back twice for what it cost to
by ropiwqefjnpoa 7y ago
No he shouldn't. We need to stop sending people to jail for all but the most heinous of crimes. He should be ordered to pay you back twice for what it cost to install and repair.
- loco5niner 7y agoTwice seems a very low.
- rumanator 7y agoIt sounds like you're confusing criminal liability with civil liability.
- nerdponx 7y agoDoes it matter? Practically, what seems more just to you: jail time, or remuneration with additional penalties?
- ropiwqefjnpoa 7y agoThat would be interesting, the victim gets to decide the penalty (up to a limit of course). The perp would have to plead their case to the victim directly, not just the judge. No jury necessary unless requested.
- ropiwqefjnpoa 7y agoNo, I just don't think jails solve the problems besides costing taxpayer money. Maybe more things should be considered civil.