3 ms·

Uh, the very first sentence is an insult.

• bildung 7y ago
  That was no insult. "You are dumb for disagreeing with me" would be an insult, and if I posted that you would have every right to feel insulted. But I didn't. But the quality of your argument was low: You just put chained unsubstantiated opinions together, the majority of which are objectively wrong. You write that "The Fed is printing almost another half trillion in cash to inject, subsidize Wall St." which a) isn't how QE works, and b) The rate of growth of e.g. S&P500 is the same as before QE started. You write that "social media is extremely biased to the left" which is an alt right conspiracy with oodles of studies showing that this is wrong. The philanthropy vs. taxation debate is decades old and the results are clear. You are of course free to reopen it with new arguments, but chose to omit those.
• krageon 7y ago
  Saying the quality of your argumentation is not up to the standard of the person in question is not a personal insult. People can make mistakes and you can too. Pointing them out is not an insult, it is an opportunity for you to improve.
  • wallace_f 7y ago
    I didn't say it was a personal insult. I said it was an insult. And by the way, insulting without giving a reason why is exactly what my comment said it was: not an argument, just an insult. I can't believe I'm actually writing this to someone who ostensibly is an adult.