3 ms·
I'd say, more specifically, it has to be a lot more modular.
by cies 7y ago
I'd say, more specifically, it has to be a lot more modular.
- gmueckl 7y agoModular in which sense? Clean interfaces between non-exchangeable modules or the actual ability to replace modules?
- marcosdumay 7y agoClean interfaces imply on exchangeable modules.
- gmueckl 7y agoMo, they don't. They are merely a prerequisite. It must be reasonably possible to reimplement the module in question and it must be possible to instantiate that alternative implementation instead of the original one. A counter-example is to have all lodules linked into a single static binary. You may have a beautiful separation berween modules in there, but the static linking makes them an immutable bundle.
- cies 7y agoThus "clean" interfaces make exchangeable modules possible. We still have to write them.