4 ms·
On the other hand Paul explicitly says that he isn’t taking what he could rightfully do. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+9&version=NI
by javagram 7y ago
On the other hand Paul explicitly says that he isn’t taking what he could rightfully do. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+9&version=NIV https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+9...
> 13 Don’t you know that those who serve in the temple get their food from the temple, and that those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on the altar?
> 14 In the same way, the Lord has commanded that those who preach the gospel should receive their living from the gospel.
> 15 But I have not used any of these rights. And I am not writing this in the hope that you will do such things for me, for I would rather die than allow anyone to deprive me of this boast.
So FWIW, I don’t believe having my priest receive a salary from the church goes against New Testament teaching. It just doesn’t conform with Paul’s personal example. There are also priests in the church who receive a salary from doing a more normal job, like being a professor at a college, but they typically don’t do nearly as much pastoral work as a priest who is assigned directly to a church.
- pbhjpbhj 7y agoYes, it isn't heterodox, just not inline with Paul's model of eldership. FWIW the whole notion of priests (but not paid workers), seems flatly contradictory to Christ's "tearing of the veil".