18 ms·
Seems like an entire valid use case of BSD-licensed code. If you don't like it you shouldn't have chosen the BSD license in the first place. Edit: Interestingl
by oefrha 7y ago
Seems like an entire valid use case of BSD-licensed code. If you don't like it you shouldn't have chosen the BSD license in the first place.
Edit: Interestingly, from https://github.com/osxfuse/osxfuse/blob/master/LICENSE.txt https://github.com/osxfuse/osxfuse/blob/master/LICENSE.txt:
> FUSE for macOS is a fork of MacFUSE. MacFUSE has been developed by Google Inc..
- kalleboo 7y ago> If you don't like it you shouldn't have chosen the BSD license in the first place I mean he changed the license away from BSD now, so, that works too.
- oefrha 7y agoBSD -> closed source is kind of a nuclear option when other less drastic options exist, but sure.
- z3t4 7y agoas I interpret most permissive license's, they say something like "must retain the above copyright notice, and this list of conditions.", which makes it not possible to change the license. But you can always go "closed source", and there's nothing stopping you from charging money (which is why Business likes these permissive license's)