4 ms·
What did he distort? What is sensationalist? This claim has been made multiple times, and the single example has been a misunderstanding of the English languag
by endorphone 7y ago
What did he distort? What is sensationalist?
This claim has been made multiple times, and the single example has been a misunderstanding of the English language (e.g. "running out").
"That random comment by a random guy on the internet is adding clarity."
That random comment that inserted non-fact, dismissed essentially the entire report...yeah, no, it added just noise. Oh look now the root comment instead of just blanket dismissing global warming entirely has now listed a small sub-summary dealing just with run-off. This is a classic denialist tactic, just moving the fence posts enough, pretending to actually be considering the science.
- marcosdumay 7y agoThe expect he quoted on Global Warming reducing the oxygen on the water found it all causes a 2% change. How's 98% for running out? All the of problem discussed on the article comes from the widespread dispersion of local pollution. The journalist is at the same time lying about a problem where there isn't any and hiding a huge problem that can be solved if people focus on it.