3 ms·
Minor point, the article doesn't specify whether the money was withdrawn or used. The conclusion hints that it was returned, without making it clear. In the ab
by user5994461 7y ago
Minor point, the article doesn't specify whether the money was withdrawn or used.
The conclusion hints that it was returned, without making it clear. In the absence of better information, I would assume that it wasn't used or withdrawn, it couldn't have been returned if it were.
- wil93 7y ago> Barclays knew where his £193,000 was sitting and, Teich says, knew when the recipient dishonestly began to withdraw the cash. Doesn't it say that he "bagan to withdraw the cash" though?