3 ms·
How can we think of housing without considering resource constraints. It’s not just space to build vertically that determines how many homes can be built..it’s
by joe_the_user 7y ago
How can we think of housing without considering resource constraints. It’s not just space to build vertically that determines how many homes can be built..it’s traffic, infrastructure, roads, water, power, schools, essential services, public services, public spaces, community amenities..the list goes on.
High density living is potentially more efficient than low density living (look European or some Asian cities, etc). Indeed, the US model of the low-density mega-city is the thing that has become unsustainable - commuting from city to suburb or suburb-to-suburb involves a huge amount of infrastructure that is simple to build but expensive to maintain.
The problem of the US in particular is that low-density has had the upper hand for so long that efforts to produce sane high density get sabotaged in a variety of ways (look the difference in cost per mile of public transit in the US versus Europe).
- jelliclesfarm 7y agoYou can also think China and eastern bloc. What people want is not high density housing but high density luxury living. Every home is no less than 1200 sq ft and two cars and 2 kids if it’s a family..and a million dollar. This is not sustainable high density. It’s a scam. You can’t compare Asian and European (i have lived in both places)high density building to what is touted in the Bay Area.
- joe_the_user 7y agoThere's little evidence that "people" all want 1200 sq ft houses in the US. They are a zoning standard but a lot of zoning is a scam to push low density, extensive development.