3 ms·
I think the biggest question here is, if a site robots.txt file prohibits bots from gathering data, should that also prohibit bots that piggyback on real user s
by ig1 16y ago
I think the biggest question here is, if a site robots.txt file prohibits bots from gathering data, should that also prohibit bots that piggyback on real user sessions ?
- pbhjpbhj 16y ago>if a site robots.txt file prohibits bots from gathering data, Pages in a robots.txt file still get put into Google's index they just don't get parsed. Surprised me to find that out; http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/robotstxt http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/robotstxt (see "Why Meta Robots is better than robots.txt").
- user24 16y agoGood question. robots.txt was designed for an age before ajax and the proliferation of plugins/toolbars/etc. It's a valid shortcoming you've identified, imho.
- RobGR 16y agoI think it's an interesting question, but I think it will be technically difficult to differentiate between a person using data (say, with a plugin that indexes everything they browse, or a separate program that indexes their browser cache) and something like the Bing toolbar.
- lazugod 16y agoAgreed. That ambiguity is why Google's PR response makes sense.