5 ms·
Direct link to the picture [https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/11/27/arts/00venus5/merlin_164332665_b5521880-e2ed-49ad-a9d4-473a55740684-mobileMasterAt3x.jpg
by throwaway744678 7y ago
Direct link to the picture [https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/11/27/arts/00venus5/merlin_164332665_b5521880-e2ed-49ad-a9d4-473a55740684-mobileMasterAt3x.jpg https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/11/27/arts/00venus5/mer...]
- IshKebab 7y agoPretty clearly a 6.
- dagav 7y agoIt could just as easily be a 5 considering the "bulb" isn't connected
- remarkEon 7y agoIt's definitely a 5. I would expect that they'd use the same tool to cast the '9' as they would the '6' (just turned 180 degrees), and the character in question pretty clearly has a different angle connecting the "bulb" to the "feather" than the '9' in the year.