3 ms·
A slightly different take on this. I've recently seen people combine Pandoc[1] with their own (generally quite small) shell script. It's pretty amazing how litt
by hazbo 7y ago
A slightly different take on this. I've recently seen people combine Pandoc[1] with their own (generally quite small) shell script. It's pretty amazing how little time it can take just using Pandoc / shell to come up with something that's just right for your needs, without all the bells and whistles.
[1]: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc https://github.com/jgm/pandoc
- black_knight 7y agoI use pandoc with mkfiles. Very simple, but really lots of possibilities (I have added liveliness checks for links and spell checks, etc).
- copperx 7y agoWhat is a mkfile? A makefile for a more modern build system?
- black_knight 7y agoYes, basically. But modern meaning from the early 90s: http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/mk http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/mk
- flir 7y agoI use pandoc for my resume. Had never considered that - thanks!
- teodorlu 7y agoI'm using Pandoc through Hakyll[1]. Hakyll does the static site stuff, and delegates to Pandoc for document conversion. Configuration is in Haskell. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/