Once you realize there's "artificial" in AI, it quickly dispel the interest. Science cannot even agree on a practical definition of intelligence. Unless you le

Once you realize there's "artificial" in AI, it quickly dispel the interest. Science cannot even agree on a practical definition of intelligence. Unless you let biologists, psychologists and neurologists work with computer scientists to advance the discussion, I don't think it's worth it to explore machine learning techniques to pursue intelligence. Don't call it ML or AI, call it "improved statistical prediction". The buzz will quickly fade.