3 ms·
Again: https://www.ipcc.ch/ https://www.ipcc.ch/ Go read. Come back when you find errors in the reports.
by pinkfoot 7y ago
Again: https://www.ipcc.ch/ https://www.ipcc.ch/
Go read. Come back when you find errors in the reports.
- LessDmesg 7y agoBut that's a biased source of information. The IPCC depends on donations from Western governments for its existence, and Western governments are fatally dependent on inventing reasons for new taxation due to their exorbitant amounts of sovereign debt. Is there any unbiased source on this extraordinary claim that the tiny CO2 emissions humanity makes actually control climate?
- pinkfoot 7y agoSo no reading for you then.
- LessDmesg 7y agoSo there are no unbiased sources on why carbon dioxide is evil? You do understand that CO2-hate is like a religion, don't you? And I have in fact gone to the IPCC's site and skimmed over a report. It was filled with phrases like "could reach ... by 2100" and "is projected to reach...". So no hard science, just empty speculation.
- adrianN 7y agoYou're fundamentally misunderstanding the term "hard science".
- imtringued 7y agoSo far roughly one third of the CO2 in the atmosphere is man made. It's not the majority but hey we are trying our best to increase that number. Give us some time!
- adrianN 7y agoThere are no unbiased sources for anything. Try finding an unbiased source for the opposite claim, preferably one that has a better explanation for the data that we've been collecting the last few decades.