3 ms·
You're ignoring the value in making the moon landings routine and instead focusing on the public propaganda value of the nth landing (the "meh" part). The most
by adventured 7y ago
You're ignoring the value in making the moon landings routine and instead focusing on the public propaganda value of the nth landing (the "meh" part).
The most important part of a technological adoption process is making a thing routine. That's where most of the value is in fact derived. That is true of all technology that is made far less inexpensive and far more routine.
We're deriving drastically more value out of space now than we did with Apollo and we're spending a lot less money to do it. That will accelerate.
Billionaires perfecting regularly landing on the moon would have a massive benefit of taking a hard-to-accomplish space task and turning it into a common task. It's the exact opposite of being an implied low value vanity project. The ability to then use the moon for manufacturing, storage, basing and experimentation has very large benefits to working on Mars and more broadly in space generally.
- dwighttk 7y ago>You're ignoring the value in making the moon landings routine which is?
- Paradigma11 7y agoBuild an industrial moon base with a mass driver. Build a few thousand kinetic impactors in space. Decommision your nuclear weapons which cost 5*10^10$/year. Profit.
- buboard 7y agothere is value to space travel for exploration, but space travel is currently promoted for tourist purposes. There is nothing wrong with that, but companies won't offer anything beyond that because going on a 6 month space trip to mars is torture rather than tourism.