4 ms·
It might be more apt a metaphor than it seems...? Resonant orbits might not be natural selection, but they might participate in a form of thermodynamic selecti
by patcon 7y ago
It might be more apt a metaphor than it seems...?
Resonant orbits might not be natural selection, but they might participate in a form of thermodynamic selection: two simple forms and structures selecting for and reinforcing one another.
They are both subsets of the same thermodynamic processes of structures/arrangements sticking arouns when they mutually support one another creating persistence in a chaotic system
My understanding is that some folks believe there are similar mechanisms underlying the emergence of both -- a generalized form of selection between mutually reinforcing structures that encode elements of prediction of the chaotic environment they reside in, be that the periodicity of orbits (that "know* a stable path that will reasonably persist) or life itself (that have similar baked in prediction abilities we perceive subjectively as consciousness).
Disclaimer: biochemist, technologist and armchair follower of complexity science
- gus_massa 7y agoThe idea is that the gravity of a moon affect the trajectory of the other moon and vice versa, until they are in resonance. It's a bad analogy, but it's closer to Lamarckism than Darwinism, but it's still a bad analogy. There are nothing similar to random mutations.
- mirekrusin 7y agoBy natural selection I meant that if you have two (or more) bodies on the same orbit they'll crash or they'll find stable orbit (resonance). Of course you see resonating ones because ones that wouldn't would collide millions of years ago.