I don't feel this article has a very strong point or that it offers strong arguments towards why this non-retro future is unavoidable and / or better. > "The s

I don't feel this article has a very strong point or that it offers strong arguments towards why this non-retro future is unavoidable and / or better. > "The status anxieties of Basil Fawlty types who either can’t or won’t adapt to a world that has little use for their prejudices are not a serious public concern." This is exactly what Urban Planning is concerned with. If Urban Planning ignores a subset of people as they are not a serious public concern (hint: they are), is it really building a future for people? Or a future designed to optimize moving cargo (people?) around...