We mostly accept power imbalances as a trade-off for more personal choice, and (often erroniously) assume they are temporary and teansient. Its obviously, not a

We mostly accept power imbalances as a trade-off for more personal choice, and (often erroniously) assume they are temporary and teansient. Its obviously, not always optimal. But the whole "Those who would trade their freedom for security deserve neither" thing runs deep. I can't say I totally disagree, although our implementation clearly needs some work.