3 ms·
> neither the current levels of income inequality nor the acceleration of said inequality is unique or historically high I'm not sure what you're saying, as t
by Supermancho 7y ago
> neither the current levels of income inequality nor the acceleration of said inequality is unique or historically high
I'm not sure what you're saying, as these statements are unqualified:
"current levels of income inequality"?
"acceleration of said inequality"?
"historically high"?
- ameister14 7y agoI'm saying that by most measurements income inequality is roughly the same as it was in the early twentieth century and the rate at which the inequality increased and the acceleration of that rate is less than it was in the early part of the 20th century. Are you saying that I need to break down what measurements I'm talking about? I can agree with that but we're on a forum and I was responding to a person who I assume, based on how they wrote, shares a general knowledge base upon which we can have a conversation.