6 ms·
Let's assume for sake of argument that "inequality" is in fact "inevitable." Then what policy conclusions are we supposed to draw?
by selfishgene 7y ago
Let's assume for sake of argument that "inequality" is in fact "inevitable."
Then what policy conclusions are we supposed to draw?
- _rpd 7y agoPolicy goals change from "reducing X" to "reducing the harmful results of X."
- username90 7y agoIt is a conservative position, hence no new policies are needed. Some pushes that inequality is proof of injustice and therefore we must make policies against it, this is just a response to that position.
- virmundi 7y agoE also have to philosophically proves it’s bad. If everyone has their needs met, should we care?
- zhoujianfu 7y agoUniversal Basic Income to even it out a bit I assume!
- eeZah7Ux 7y ago...which would significantly decreasing inequality - immediacy disproving the belief that inequality is some sort of inevitable natural phenomenon.