>I regularly use it to produce binaries that are competitive with (often better than) Go in terms of size and (start time) perf. How do they compare to go in t

>I regularly use it to produce binaries that are competitive with (often better than) Go in terms of size and (start time) perf. How do they compare to go in terms of speed? Another comment also said graal native images still suffer with throughput vs using the jvm due to profile guided optimizations.