3 ms·
denying them commissions they have already earned The key word is here "already earned". Denying that doesn't make any sense, any which way we look at it. Sti
by akudha 7y ago
denying them commissions they have already earned
The key word is here "already earned". Denying that doesn't make any sense, any which way we look at it.
Still, punish the 95% (or whatever very high number) for the shitty behavior of other 5% of people? I understand it is business and companies need to protect their profits, but this is ridiculous.
- d357r0y3r 7y ago> Still, punish the 95% (or whatever very high number) for the shitty behavior of other 5% of people? I understand it is business and companies need to protect their profits, but this is ridiculous. Yeah, I agree. Just pointing out that this stuff rarely comes from mustache-twirling villains and more often is just a misguided attempt to solve some other related problem. Cutting off commission that has already been earned sounds pretty bad.
- SpicyLemonZest 7y agoI'd bet money that the policies don't literally say "we will claw back commissions you've already earned if you go on leave". The scenario is almost certainly that there's a specific point where commissions are earned as a matter of policy, and that policy doesn't align with the informal understanding of when you earn a commission or the timeframe of the work that earned you the commission.