5 ms·
Agreed. Anyone who texts shouldn't buy this phone. However, I would say that it's not aimed at SMS'ers and as such is not executed poorly. Strikes me to have t
by rubidium 16y ago
Agreed. Anyone who texts shouldn't buy this phone. However, I would say that it's not aimed at SMS'ers and as such is not executed poorly.
Strikes me to have two major markets: (1) people who only want to talk to people via phones (e.g. some of the elderly) and (2) as a fashionable item. The gold one would be a head-turner and topic of conversation.
Some people want to get rid of SMS from their way of life (or never adopted it in the first place), and hark back for simpler times. This phone appeals to that.
- jacquesm 16y ago> hark back for simpler times. When it comes to phones I go through alternating phases of high-tech and as simple as it gets, mostly because I get frustrated at how bad high tech phones usually work as phones (they're great little computers, but I mostly use my phone to call). SMS is no longer optional, even if you want to get rid of it, typically service messages are only sent using SMS, not voice and people will simply assume that even if you didn't respond that you still read their SMS message saying they'll be an hour late. It's like with businesses and FAX, you may never send one but people pretty much used to assume that you were at least capable of receiving them.
- rubidium 16y ago>SMS is no longer optional. False! Perhaps for your way of life, but there's the age-old 'you != everyone'. Once your friends know you don't text, they stop texting you. They may think you're a Luddite, but that's another issue. Even though you (and me for that matter) may want SMS on phones, I don't think it was a poor design choice to skip SMS on this phone.
- jacquesm 16y ago> Once your friends know you don't text, they stop texting you. I really really tried, but apparently your friends respect you better than mine do me :) I don't mind being known as a Luddite ;)
- pbhjpbhj 16y agoOn UK landlines now you can receive texts, they have a service that does text-to-speech and reads the text to you. With this then you would only lack a way to send texts, people wanting a simple phone probably don't want that.
- sbarre 16y agoIn Canada it's the same thing. Text a landline and they get a call with a TTS of the text and a message indicating what phone number it came from.
- code_duck 16y agoWell, but like the above poster said it's not all about your friends texting you - verizon, for instance, sends password reset notices through SMS, and other service messages.
- drivingmenuts 16y ago> SMS is no longer optional, even if you want to get rid of it, typically service messages are only sent using SMS, not voice and people will simply assume that even if you didn't respond that you still read their SMS message saying they'll be an hour late. And they'll be wrong. And an hour late. I would argue that politeness requires the sender to contact the receiver in a manner of the receiver's choosing, not the sender's, while the receiver should not go to extremes to avoid the sender. Lack of SMS is the normal, passive state and since there is no legal or social requirement to have it, I wouldn't consider not having it impolite at all. Odd, perhaps, if one takes the receiver's demographic into account, but not impolite.
- bane 16y agoFor people that insist on SMSing me junk, I give them my Google Voice number instead and tell them don't expect me to respond in a timely fashion.