7 ms·
What Do You Think about This Seamless “Registering/Login” User Experience?
- nguyenkims 7y agoThis button allows Google to know the fact that I'm currently on this specific website. If more and more websites implement this button, Google will have access to my complete browsing history! IMO a website must ask for a permission before displaying this button. Facebook also has a similar button ("Continue with {my_name}") that use the same iframe method.
- netsharc 7y agoWell FB (and Twitter) already have "Like this page" or "Tweet about this" embeds, and those allow them to track you across the Internet (or at least on sites with those buttons).
- echelon 7y agoThis really disturbs me. What's the security model for this? Even if the site never learns my Google identity, I hate having to close the signup window. If I misclick, they get my identity. It's so sick.
- rhizome 7y agoI think it's probably the same as it ever was. By my read this is essentially Google releasing an iframe (or whatever) version of their "allow blorbulax.com?" page with the message reworded and combined with the "yes" button.
- Jonnax 7y agoI don't like it. I makes me feel that a miss-tap will cause me to send my details to a site
- the_pwner224 7y ago> It makes me feel that a miss-tap will cause me to send my details to a site This reminds me of one time when I logged in to Chrome and misclicked on the dialog that asked whether to sync data. I very quickly went to settings and disabled sync, but I have a feeling Google got all my bookmarks and history and saved passwords. That's what finally made me delete Chrome (I had already been using Firefox primarily but now have Falkon (WebKit-based KDE browser) instead of Chrome). Very malicious how the option to keep your information to yourself is gated behind many opt-outs but if you accidentally opt-in once they take everything.
- ryukafalz 7y agoI've seen these before; it feels way too intrusive and out of place on the page. If I'd clicked a "sign in with Google" button, then okay fine, but a big dialog covering the corner of the page? No thanks. Checking out that page, the traditional signup button (which is what I'd use as I'd rather not use Google login) is actually under that dialog. You can't see it until you dismiss the dialog.
- chii 7y agohhm, how did they do that? I thought the google oauth flow required that it redirect to a google page (and show the info/permission the oauth flow is asking for). Unless there's a security leak somewhere in cookies, which exposed your email address to this site (which doesn't belong to google i presume).
- space_fountain 7y agoProbably iframes
- kipdotcom 7y agoA big no no for me. Seen a couple of sites and never tried clicking. I'd rather use the 'sign in with google' button where I get to confirm rather this privacy insensitive method.
- jcmontx 7y agoWell, as a user I love it. In the other hand, as a conscious consumer, I absolutely hate giving even more information to Google. It would be cool to have an open source, non-profit organization to work as an universally accepted authentication provider platform. One can always dream.
- wayneftw 7y agoI find it to be intrusive and disturbing. Medium.com does this and I've always hated it. Mediums usage of it actually caused me to switch, on my work computer, from always being logged into Google, to never being logged into my Google account. Now if I have to use one of my companies apps that requires a Google login, I do it incognito. At home, I never browse while logged in, so I didn't ever notice it that much. Using my Google account for logging into a third party web application is never my first choice. I'll take separate email / passwords for everybody please and thank you.
- 0-_-0 7y agoIf you use Firefox, you might want to look into multi-account containers or first party isolation. Basically, you can log into Gmail in one tab without being logged into Google in all tabs.
- mlthoughts2018 7y agoYour approach is very reasonable, but the option I really like is just never visiting Medium period.
- lazyasciiart 7y agoGod, Medium has the worst login experience of any site I use. What makes them think they are too clever to be usable with a password manager like the rest of the damn internet? I usually just reopen the article in an incognito tab instead of going through their stupid “send me an email!” bullshit login.
- blfr 7y agoNotion.so does the same thing. You can log in with Google or get a magic link. User/password is an inconvenient method of logging in. True. But it's so common that we have password managers making it convenient again. And supposedly better solution don't have the benefit of that tooling.
- rpeden 7y ago
- friedman23 7y agoGiven that this is a website for medical use, I'm surprised they are allowing account creation with google oauth. I'm 95% sure it's not HIPAA compliant.
- capableweb 7y agoThe website/company seems to be located in Bengaluru, India so I doubt HIPAA applies to them.
- judge2020 7y agohttps://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa/identity-platform https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa/identity-... - looks like, at least for Cloud Identity (for employees accessing the internal records and databases themselves) - it's HIPPA compliant when the people implementing it do their DD. Since GSuite and Gmail logins are fairly tightly integrated, I would bet the regular auth system and oauth system for Google accounts is HIPPA-complaint.
- friedman23 7y agoIf you are using a service like google oauth you need to sign a business associate agreement with them before using any of their services in a HIPAA compliant manner. I've searched for how to sign this contract pretty unsuccessfully.
- 11235813213455 7y agoIt's probably using google oauth SDK https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2UserAgent#example https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2UserA... (there's no popup raised if you're already signed in google). You can then send and validate the token on server-side, and create an account there
- Ice_cream_suit 7y agoThis is world wide surveillance gone mad. I try to avoid using creepy websites like this.
- edoceo 7y agoI see one like this on other sites - eg Instagram. Hate it. Don't assume I want to give you my identity. But! Make it super easy for me to act when I decide. These force-auth types are over-reaching and intrusive. They cause pain to the power-user and cause incidental harm to the standard-user (and maybe more)
- rhizome 7y agoHeck, I don't like it also because I don't want to give Google the data they'll slurp from this connection. Not for free, anyway.
- beders 7y agogee, it is 2019 and we still haven't solved registration/sign in ;)
- buboard 7y agoi find this creepy. "why does this website know my name"
- appleshore 7y agoThe first time this happened to me, I instinctively clicked to login thinking Chrome was trying to log me into Gmail or my Google Account. I didn’t realize I was giving info to some random site, I was just trying to swat away a popup.
- xg15 7y agoCreating a persistent public online identity on an untrusted service at the click of a misleading button? What could possibly go wrong?
- avip 7y agoSomething marginally less seamless: try to sign-in to google play console with a user that is not the one currently "syncing" in chrome.
- zemnmez 7y agointeresting ... I wonder how this is secured from attacks from the website itself redressing it and/or clickjacking attacks
- lubujackson 7y agoI saw this on Zillow and I tracked it down to https://github.com/openid/OpenYOLO-Web https://github.com/openid/OpenYOLO-Web or some similar implementation of that protocol. I haven't looked into it yet but I've been intending to figure out how it works and I was surprised I haven't read about it yet anywhere.
- judge2020 7y agoYes - https://github.com/zapier/google-yolo-inline https://github.com/zapier/google-yolo-inline But it seems the page for one tap - https://developers.google.com/identity/one-tap/web/ https://developers.google.com/identity/one-tap/web/ - is no longer a thing; the the only solution for "web" experiences is the "sign in/continue with google" javascript client that does the pop-up, eg. https://doodle.com/login https://doodle.com/login.
- chocolatkey 7y agoThey discontinued the other one because someone demonstrated that you could hide it under another element and trick people into clicking on it
- thosakwe 7y agoEDIT: I misread the OP. I was under the impression that the popup came after clicking "Log in," rather than just being immediately shown on load. Ignore my comment. Personally, I like it, and I think that from the typical user's perspective, it can probably be more convenient. At least, it's more convenient than the classical "click a login link, which takes you to another page, try to remember your password, maybe hit I forgot and have to view your email, and then hope the site takes you back to the page you were originally on" flow. A big win is not having to leave the content you're currently viewing, which is an annoyance on mobile. A lot of the comments on this thread strike me as cynical, and are dismissing the user experience aspect of something like this. Especially considering that the average user doesn't have a password manager (I could be wrong on this claim, I don't have a source ATM). EDIT: I should clarify that I'm talking about the "quick sign in" pattern in general, not necessarily about any specific auth provider. P.S. If you're trying to produce a similar flow on your site, the Credential Manager API (navigator.credentials) allows you save user credentials locally, so when they visit your site, their browser can automatically sign them in.
- tus88 7y agoHow about: forgot what email I used for a particular website, so try and login (not register!) with one of them...oops it was the wrong one but I now have an account apparently along with welcome emails to match. I am very caution about putting an email into any login form without double checking it is the right one.
- gothroach 7y agoSeeing this on a site would instantly remove any desire I had to make an account.
- Animats 7y agoIt's a suction pump for the onboarding funnel. It is not your friend.
- dclaw 7y agoHate it.... I do not want a site to have access to my information before I even open an account... even if that's just some anonymized ID created for the task. Ironically, you must sign in with a social media account( facebook / twitter ) or google / github to even use this site..... Single Sign On crap just leads to your whole life getting hacked if something happens. if I cannot setup an account with a unique email address and password, I will leave.
- Rainymood 7y agoMy prediction: People on HN will hate it, the general public loves it.
- roobs 7y agoIt’s insecure too :) https://blog.innerht.ml/google-yolo/ https://blog.innerht.ml/google-yolo/