3 ms·
Not sure what your point is? India too has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, while remaining federated and to some extent democratic. The e
by dbspin 7y ago
Not sure what your point is?
India too has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, while remaining federated and to some extent democratic. The elevation of China's billions out of poverty has come through it's involvement with the marketplace of global capitalist democracies - not the other way around.
- oefrha 7y agoIndian and Chinese GDP were both ~$100 billion around 1970. In 2018, Indian GDP is $2.7 trillion whereas Chinese GDP is $13.6 trillion, five times the former (World Bank, nominal). The populations of the two are very close, so per capita GDP is also roughly 1:5. The PPP difference is smaller. No offense to the Indian people, but I always find it amusing when people use India as the counterexample to China to show "you don't need Socialism to achieve the same results." When it almost tells the exact opposite story. There's also this.[3] [1] https://data.worldbank.org/country/india https://data.worldbank.org/country/india [2] https://data.worldbank.org/country/china https://data.worldbank.org/country/china [3] https://web.archive.org/web/20160921084037/http://www.spectrezine.org/global/chomsky.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20160921084037/http://www.spectr...
- dbspin 7y agoChina is not in any sense socialist or even communist. It lacks free health care, public housing, and state service provision. It is neither internationalist nor collectivist. It's a hybrid single party ethno-nationalist capitalist state, or if you prefer a fascist oligarchy. The Chinese economy is overvalued, and economic growth is grinding to a halt despite massive government spending. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3033564/china-doubles-value-infrastructure-project-approvals-stave https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3033564/c... Every western country is a counter example.
- oefrha 7y agoRandomly throwing the "fascism" word around completely undermines any credibility you might have left. Also, I'll probably take World Bank's data more seriously than an unsubstantiated claim by some random guy on the Internet. Oh, and it wasn't me who brought up India as the counterexample.
- imustbeevil 7y ago> Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy > Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties. Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society. Using a word exactly correctly is not "random". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
- dang 7y agoPlease don't use HN for ideological battle. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- dang 7y agoPlease don't respond to a bad comment by breaking the site guidelines yourself. That just makes the thread even worse. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- dang 7y agoPlease don't use HN for nationalistic or ideological battle. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html