I desire the same type of "unbiased" information myself but I do not believe it is attainable for this topic. The amount of emotion that people have about the e

I desire the same type of "unbiased" information myself but I do not believe it is attainable for this topic. The amount of emotion that people have about the effects of pollution on temperature makes it hard to take anything at face value. As far as I can tell, the scientific consensus is that CO2 generated climate change is happening more or less according to the models, with the exact degree somewhat difficult to determine year-on-year. The situation along inaction, has provoked a strong emotional response in many people. It don't see how the combination of these things demonstrates a lack of objectivity. The approach seems rather, uh, bad faith. Consider "People seem to react emotionally when I talk a flat earth. Where can I get objective information that considers flat and round earth possibilities in a balanced fashion not reacting emotionally to flat possibilities?"