6 ms·

I'm genuinely curious why only nest, alexa, google home[^1] devices get highlighted - aren't they all use the same tech as the Google App on android? Why are an

• madez 7y ago
  I wish it were socially accepted to tell people to turn their Android device off while they are in company. I wish I could tell people that visit me to turn their device off or put it into rf and sound shielded containers. I don't mind people using computers and their powers to ease their lives. I don't want to deny them that just because they are next to me or in my home. I just don't want them to use that power to collect and track and surveil everything at all times around them, wittingly or unwittinlgy.
  • macawfish 7y ago
    This is acceptable in some circles in certain circumstances.
  • DebtDeflation 7y ago
    >I just don't want them to use that power to collect and track and surveil everything at all times around them Unfortunately, the trend is to stick a camera and microphone (and compute/network stack) on every consumer device sold to you, including TVs and refrigerators. Not sure what the solution is, since the vendors can make a plausible argument for the convenience provided by voice control and additional features enabled by object detection. Perhaps some combination of local (rather than cloud) inferencing, immediate deletion of data, and privacy laws that clearly assign ownership of data to the consumer and dramatically limit what telemetry data can be sent back?
    • SmellyGeekBoy 7y ago
      > Not sure what the solution is A soldering iron?
    • brewdad 7y ago
      We recently remodeled our kitchen and updated appliances. One microwave we looked at had Alexa built-in. I couldn't think of a single scenario where I would interact with my microwave without standing right in front of it. I could maybe see it's usefulness for certain elderly or disabled people but I couldn't figure out why the majority of the population would ever want that.
  • nebulous1 7y ago
    Why are you carving out Android instead of all smartphones? Also, you can turn off OK google in Android, although they don't make it as easy as they should.
    • jstanley 7y ago
      What is actually the correct way to do this? I don't use Android myself (I use https://ubports.com/ https://ubports.com/ - it's great and you should try it), but several times I've had other people ask me to turn it off, and the best I can come up with is just dragging the Google search box off the home screen. But there's no feedback to suggest it's not still listening, only that shouting "OK GOOGLE" at the phone no longer does anything.
      • nebulous1 7y ago
        Hopefully somebody else will reply to you because it's been a while for me and I forget the details. There are settings in the Google App itself, settings in your Google Account in general and also I denied the relevant recording permissions for various google apps. I'm using Lineage at the moment. I'd like to ditch Android entirely but I'm not sure ubports is where it needs to be yet. Unfortunately the open non-Android mobile OS's seem to die before they reach maturity. Obviously it's tough on them if they're competing with an existing app ecosystem, as they are.
      • krageon 7y ago
        Flashing it with something that has no google services is the most correct way to make sure you are not being spied on.
        • thecatspaw 7y ago
          Actually, nevermind, I'll just go home again. Its been fun meeting you old friend
    • madez 7y ago
      I assume you ask that because you are aware that any device with the capabilities of a smartphone can be made into a powerful surveillance device by whoever the entity is that has control over it. I see variations of that argument very often. Its essence goes like this: A: This is a proven threat. B: But so could be this and that. A: Right, could be. B: But we can't get rid of them all, so let's just do nothing. Here person B somehow convinced themselves that doing anything in that regard to be futile because they can't solve this class of problems once and for all. There is a distinction between possible threats on one side and an existing threat based on evidence on the other side. Any device with the capabilities of a smartphone can be nefarious, but doesn't have to be. Any Android device certainly is. So I'd like to tell people to turn off their Android devices, but may they keep using their open hardware and software phone, because I don't see them as the threat, but the entity that controls their Android device.
  • XorNot 7y ago
    Probably because it feels really bizarre to carve out one specific OS for a whole a suite of devices which all have the same basic capabilities.
  • GistNoesis 7y ago
    With a little marketing, you can turn it into a key feature for your tinder app. Using the gesture recognition radar and microphone in the android phone near the bed to collect sexual performance statistics.
  • soulofmischief 7y ago
    I have voice-activated assistant on my droid turned off, meanwhile Siri is active on all iDevices, and everyone with a laptop at your place is a mole. Do you expect to altogether prevent people from bringing computing devices into your home? If you are not a state target, then that is just silly. Focus your malcontent on the real bad actors, not their victims.
    • kaffeemitsahne 7y ago
      The various states would love to have as much data as they can on every citizen. Therefore, we're all state targets.
      • soulofmischief 7y ago
        Language is useless if we don't set boundaries. In this case, as you already know despite wanting to twist its meaning, "State target" refers to someone whom the state is specifically, actively expending resources in order to target. Target being the key word. Being part of a giant nation-wide dragnet doesn't make you a target.
    • a3n 7y ago
      Actually this is interesting. Some US states require two party consent for recording. Doesn't that make a phone in your pocket illegal in those states, unless you say "I have a phone in my pocket, and it's recording."
      • soulofmischief 7y ago
        Let's travel to such a state and find out for ourselves. We'll flip a coin on who gets to be the defendant.
    • skrause 7y ago
      > I have voice-activated assistant on my droid turned off, meanwhile Siri is active on all iDevices This is not true, voice-activated Siri is a setting as well and turned off on my iPhone.
  • turk73 7y ago
    I think the "unwitting" part is what is the bigger issue here. I know it is conspiracist, but some think Google was founded with the backing of the CIA. Given that these spy orgs wish to spy on literally every single person and apparently have the technology to do it (we paid for all of it) we are essentially funding our own slavery. A jail with no walls, just like China's.
• eloisant 7y ago
  I might be wrong but I don't think Android phone are always listening by default.
  • criley2 7y ago
    All smartphones, Apple and Android, use dedicated audio processors which are always listening for the command word by saving recent audio to a buffer and analyzing it before discarding it. There has never been any evidence that I've ever seen that these audio processors save and transmit their work pre-activation, only post-activation of the service. Although I do remember in the 2014-2016 time frame when the CIA hack tools got released I believe there was a tool which could basically hot-mic certain iPhones through a zero day and use it to live transmit to a state actor without warning the user (minus the device getting hot from recording and network access). I'm sure Android has similar zero days just as all software does.
    • vageli 7y ago
      > All smartphones, Apple and Android, use dedicated audio processors which are always listening for the command word by saving recent audio to a buffer and analyzing it before discarding it. Not all Android phones have Google Assistant.
      • lucb1e 7y ago
        True, just nearly all.
    • notatoad 7y ago
      >All smartphones, Apple and Android, use dedicated audio processors which are always listening for the command word This is blatantly false. Many high-end android phones and all recent iPhones do this. A large number of phones do not.
      • deleted 7y ago
        [deleted]
• davinic 7y ago
  Siri is always enabled on iPhones by default.
  • joeblau 7y ago
    I don't think it is. When you're setting up your phone, you have to go through the "hey Siri" training to enable it.
    • davinic 7y ago
      This is not true. It has been on by default since iOS 9.
      • hnaccount141 7y ago
        I've got a phone here on iOS 12 that started from a a clean wipe this morning. The initial setup asks you if you'd like to enable siri (and certainly pushes you in that direction), but if you don't accept, neither hey siri nor holding down the power button will activate it.
        • Sendotsh 7y ago
          Yeah I can confirm. I just set up my iPhone and it absolutely asks if you want Siri activated. I said no, and it doesn’t respond to any of the keywords or button presses and is completely disabled throughout the phone.
• diffeomorphism 7y ago
  Two obvious reasons: - Smart home devices are used at home, where you have a high expectation of privacy. In contrast phones go with you everywhere. - Those devices are supposed to hear everything in the room clearly. A phone in your pocket or backpack? If they can make their mics good enough for that, I would like to have that tech.
  • teslafanboi 7y ago
    > If they can make their mics good enough for that, I would like to have that tech. have you used a phone made this decade? of course they are capable of listening in your pocket or backup
  • lucb1e 7y ago
    I don't find that I expect more privacy at my home than when talking to someone at work, or while walking in a park. I'm aware that someone can overhear in public, but I'm not constantly aware that a microphone is following me. And in many places, people take their phones out of their pocket. And women's pockets often don't have good pockets at all, so whenever they sit down the phone is also put down (or in use).