> There is a public nuisance aspect to people who are living on the street or in forests on land they don’t own/rent. I don't think there is a connection to pr

> There is a public nuisance aspect to people who are living on the street or in forests on land they don’t own/rent. I don't think there is a connection to property ownership and the presence of a nuisance caused by people. So what if people are living on land that they don't own and rent? Who has decreed that land ownership must be the absolute fundamental social norm? What if people are instinctually disinclined to believe or participate in land ownership? Why do we insist on being the only animal for which a subset charts the entire landmass of the earth into a grid, assigning ownership to every square inch? It's absurd. People tenting under bridges, on bike trails, in forests, don't bother me. Rich people have stolen far more from my family than poor people have.