3 ms·
Unfortunately, the Guardian article is missing some information from the Washington Post link. Chiefly, that Canada rejected their return and the suspicious beh
by wlkr 7y ago
Unfortunately, the Guardian article is missing some information from the Washington Post link. Chiefly, that Canada rejected their return and the suspicious behaviour reported by US officers.
- nikanj 7y agohttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50067575 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50067575 And the fact they’d been denied entry
- Cenk 7y agoYou’re right, thanks for pointing that out
- bruceb 7y agoNot missing, selectively withheld. Including the full story reduces the clickbait. Many stories are presented in a way to create outrage, not actually present the story accurately.
- im3w1l 7y agoIt's curious how some people are the target of more outrage bait than others.
- disgruntledphd2 7y agoThe globe and mail were unable to confirm any of this, which is weird. It's also VERY unusual for a country to let tourists in and not have them back in this situation.
- nikanj 7y agoIt’s unclear how long they had been in Canada for. Maybe the Canadian border service also flagged them as a risk for illegal immigration?