4 ms·

There's way too much being read into a statement which begins with "likely". There are plenty of things in life that are hard to explain in a way that doesn't

There's way too much being read into a statement which begins with "likely". There are plenty of things in life that are hard to explain in a way that doesn't lead to misunderstandings which are also not very consequential. For example, when people ask what I do, I could say I work at an ISP, or that I'm a systems engineer (my title), or that I'm a system administrator (some of what I do), or that I'm a software developer (the rest of what I do), or any number of other things. Depending on how interested in it I think they will be, or how interested in explaining it I am, I might respond that it's likely not that interesting. If the person asking actually wants to pursue it further, the polite thing to do would be to say "oh, I find it interesting, if you're willing to talk about it". If they responded "How do you know what's interesting to me?" I would take that as somewhat aggressive, and definitely wouldn't be interested in explaining further, depending on how I perceived their disposition. Perhaps it's a cultural miscommunication.

Dylan16807 7y ago
That phrasing (at least without the "to you") is fine when you are genuinely open to saying more. It's not fine as a way to refuse to say more. So you're talking about a completely different context. If they get aggressive and you then decide that you don't want to explain, that's fine. But that's not what happened here.
- kbenson 7y ago
  > But that's not what happened here. Eh, I don't think you can say that definitively. I took it as WaxProlix not wanting to/being unwilling to talk about it because it's boring, and as they found it boring, they thought other people would likely (the word they used, which I think people are ignoring) find it boring as well.
  - darshan 7y ago
    I'd agree with you if it were just the first message. But they then explained exactly what they meant and why, and that's what I offered them feedback on. They apologized to the person they said it to, and it all seems settled from my perspective.

Dylan16807 7y ago

That phrasing (at least without the "to you") is fine when you are genuinely open to saying more. It's not fine as a way to refuse to say more. So you're talking about a completely different context. If they get aggressive and you then decide that you don't want to explain, that's fine. But that's not what happened here.

kbenson 7y ago
> But that's not what happened here. Eh, I don't think you can say that definitively. I took it as WaxProlix not wanting to/being unwilling to talk about it because it's boring, and as they found it boring, they thought other people would likely (the word they used, which I think people are ignoring) find it boring as well.
- darshan 7y ago
  I'd agree with you if it were just the first message. But they then explained exactly what they meant and why, and that's what I offered them feedback on. They apologized to the person they said it to, and it all seems settled from my perspective.