Unexpected problems appear often when giving automated decision making free reign to make decisions without human intervention. It is simply that I see zero ev

Unexpected problems appear often when giving automated decision making free reign to make decisions without human intervention. It is simply that I see zero evidence that the Nick Bostron, Lesswrong, and etc. school of thought provides any insight in regard to these problems. The thing the "AI might become autonomous" school doesn't seem at all interest in the processes of human bureaucracy or in even AI as it exist now but rather views as simply a god, devil or Genie which grants wishes or damns to hell. If anything, the approach seems counter-productive.