4 ms·
Thank you. There is a tendency in tech people to dismiss politics as less than important ("just politics", "just political"). It's a fundamental part of our s
by tim58 7y ago
Thank you. There is a tendency in tech people to dismiss politics as less than important ("just politics", "just political"). It's a fundamental part of our social fabric.
- lukifer 7y agoSimler & Hanson provide a pretty solid explanatory framework: http://elephantinthebrain.com/ http://elephantinthebrain.com/
- raxxorrax 7y agoHave only read parts of that, but describing attributes to human nature mostly fails to do so and attaches them to the author instead. No, not everything is political. From that perspective you could substitute the term politics with "battle for share", which can be political, but doesn't encompass the whole set of politics. You can even generalize that further and it gets more primitive along the way: "Every day is a battle for survival" Of course it is political play to attach attributes to groups and then highlighting fault lines. But it is the most primitive form of what many people call politics. And since it doesn't accomplish anything productive, many people have the need to remove politics from platforms like SE, because they just see it as a distraction to the topic at hand and is pitting people against each other. Pronouns do that, most of the gender discussion does that and now we have also started a new discussions about racism that won't net positive results. All because some people crave some validation? Maybe that is not always the case, but it seems that people wanted a conflict and that is what they got.
- crooked-v 7y ago> No, not everything is political Name literally anything and I will point out its political implications.
- rogual 7y agoNumber theory!
- Fnoord 7y agoNot sure, there must be something related to politics at the Wikipedia number theory page [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_theory
- crooked-v 7y agoSome Christian fundamentalists oppose modern set theory, which is an integral part of number theory: https://boingboing.net/2012/08/07/what-do-christian-fundamentali.html https://boingboing.net/2012/08/07/what-do-christian-fundamen...
- raxxorrax 7y agoThat would not constitute proof. But to humor you and me, what about cornflakes?
- Fnoord 7y agoCornflakes? Not very hard. It is related to GMO (genetically modified maize), maize/corn, large (subsidized?) agriculture in US, life stock feed (which one can argue is inefficient), high fructose corn syrup. (Took me 5 minutes to come up with that, by just reading Wikipedia.)
- NikolaeVarius 7y agoI have no stake in this discussion, but man, anything to do with Corn is a minefield. https://www.bankableinsight.com/the-politics-of-corn.html https://www.bankableinsight.com/the-politics-of-corn.html
- zrobotics 7y agoThe food literally created due to political beliefs? "The story of corn flakes goes back to the late 19th century, when a team of Seventh-day Adventists began to develop new foods to adhere to the vegetarian diet recommended by the church. Members of the group experimented with a number of different grains, including wheat, oats, rice, barley and maize. In 1894, John Harvey Kellogg, the superintendent of the Battle Creek Sanitarium in Michigan and an Adventist, used these recipes as part of a strict vegetarian regimen for his patients, which also included no alcohol, tobacco or caffeine. The diet he imposed consisted entirely of bland foods. A follower of Sylvester Graham, the man cited as inspiration of graham crackers and graham bread, Kellogg believed that spicy or sweet foods would increase passions." [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_flakes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_flakes
- odkamkfn 7y agoLooking at everything in life through the lens of politics is certainly possible, but it will probably make you unhappy.