5 ms·
"It is not feasible to get much more energy into a material than 1 eV per atom. Most solids have atomic weights of 30 GeV/c^2 [*] which yields E/m = 3x10^-11 c
by andrewtbham 7y ago
"It is not feasible to get much more energy into a material than 1 eV per atom. Most solids have atomic weights of 30 GeV/c^2 [*] which yields E/m = 3x10^-11 c^2. When you convert this into the more human Watt-hour/kg, you get 850 W-hr/kg. "
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-battery-energy-density-improves-5-8-per-year-Does-this-represent-an-average-or-is-it-a-consistent-trend-each-year-Do-these-improvements-increase-the-cost-What-has-been-the-trend-if-any-regarding-energy-to-weight-ratio https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-battery-energy-density...
I believe.. this is true, but not 100% sure. However the limit is higher with air batteries... as stated in another answer. The energy density of gasoline is high because it uses air intake for oxidation.
Also... part of why rockets are so big is because they also don't use oxygen from the atmosphere, they carry their oxidizer in the rocket.
- marcosdumay 7y agoThis is an orders of magnitude approximation.
- alexis_fr 7y agoTesla Model 3’s batteries are 207 Wh/kg. It strikes me as so close to the limit, whereas we usually are an order of magnitude under, in physics. At one point the only improvement beyond the physical barrier will be to throw electrons into a void sphere and call that a battery.