4 ms·
The Harvard response undercuts itself by bringing up "environmental sustainability" It isn't wrong, but it seriously calls into question whether the aim of the
by bpodgursky 7y ago
The Harvard response undercuts itself by bringing up "environmental sustainability"
It isn't wrong, but it seriously calls into question whether the aim of the recommendation against red meat purely accurate nutrition science or a broader agenda.
- throw_xyzyz 7y agoDon't get why you are being downvoted. We need science to focus on the right questions. Otherwise it's ideology with a veneer of scientism on top of it.
- dahdum 7y agoThat was my first thought too. Unless they’ve done research on the future health impacts of climate change, including it weakens their argument.
- humble_engineer 7y agoIts absolutely ridiculous that people are down voting you. I'm not eating bugs.
- WomanCanCode 7y agoI think this is an important distinction. If something should be unhealthy for consumption then it has to be because of ingesting it and not because of how it will impact the market or environment.