4 ms·
Does this mean the field is leveled against Chinese shippers?
by theflyinghorse 7y ago
Does this mean the field is leveled against Chinese shippers?
- pcdoodle 7y agoWondering the same thing here. I do like cheap gizmos off of ali express however I'm willing to pay fair shipping (We all pay in one way or another).
- oh_sigh 7y agoMaybe. Maybe China will start subsidizing their mail instead of having the US do it.
- microcolonel 7y agoIt is their prerogative, either way. I always assumed it was them paying the subsidies all along.
- kelnos 7y agoNot sure why you're being downvoted; that's a perfectly reasonable prediction. If shipping costs start reducing shipments of goods to the US by any appreciable amount, and the Chinese government wants to offset that, a subsidy is a reasonable way for them to do it. And I'd much rather the Chinese government subsidize their citizen's postage than the US government doing it for them.
- Danieru 7y agoChina would need to use their foreign reserve to do this subsidy. Ignoring belt and road all of China's internal industry subsidies use Yaun. Belt and Road use dollars but are "lent" thus in theory China is not reducing its foreign reserve. Problem for China as we see in their capital controls is maintaining wealth in Yaun. Any subsidy which requires using foreign dollars, as paying the US postal tarrif would, weakens the states stability.
- sct202 7y agoIf it is, they'll just move to doing Fulfillment by Amazon or the soon to come Fulfillment by Ebay.
- driverdan 7y agoCosts will still go up. FBA may increase costs even more since the item would have to be shipped twice plus pay Amazon's vig.
- Dylan16807 7y agoIf only FBA didn't have an effective minimum of about $5.
- nekoashide 7y agoThis appears to only affect small shipments, so like one USB cable from China would no longer be subsidized if mailed from China. But in reality if it's cheaper to buy a warehouse here in the US and drop ship from that you may not see much of a difference in cost.