3 ms·
I feel mostly convinced that your point here is the sane one. One nitpick though: > do autoscaling (using AWS) But that would mean that you're partially lock
by worldsayshi 7y ago
I feel mostly convinced that your point here is the sane one.
One nitpick though:
> do autoscaling (using AWS)
But that would mean that you're partially locked in on AWS? Only when it comes to auto scaling bit still...
- StreamBright 7y agoYeah I am willingly be locked in to AWS which is a stable, proven, compliant solution with sophisticated SLAs and even paid support. I can create reliable distributed highly available performant services on top of it. That is all I need. As far as locking in on Kubernetes goes I am not sure.
- jrumbut 7y agoSomeone has to have physical servers somewhere right, even with kubernetes? You're either locked into a provider for that or locked into the team that runs your own datacenters.
- worldsayshi 7y agoSure but if all your infrastructure scripts are built with kubernetes in mind switching from one provider to another becomes much less labor intensive than if they are built with Azure or Amazon in mind. At least in theory.