I define it the same way the dictionary does: the condition of having or being composed of differing elements. All I'm saying is there's two ways to look at it

I define it the same way the dictionary does: the condition of having or being composed of differing elements. All I'm saying is there's two ways to look at it: either there's a lot of different options, or there are a lot of different options and they're not evenly distributed. To me, I don't know why "evenly distributed" matters and it feels like sophistry. Especially when the people making the argument are generally anti-diversity (to be ridiculously generous) in the first place.